cooL ap, ESL cuncepchuel Doc(tore?) wit e’CooLear Moam s@t communsens.com\samps fall oh!:

! “It reveils a list of utterances in which the subject: TSymptom is used.”
…

“The activity that comes nearest to phrasing is probably ‘reverse engineering’.”

…

“If you make the language smaller than L0 it will disintegrate and the knowledge engine will come to a halt. L0 consists of a symbol domain S0 and a rules domain R0 like this: L0 = (S0, R0) [3]”
…
“It is important to avoid the storage of redundant information. For that reason the equality principles of Leibniz are applied to any piece of added information:

L1) Principle of the equality of what can not be distinguished.
L2) Principle of the indistinguishability of what is equal.”

…

“The architecture of the network is a derivative of the verbs of the language.”
…

“Updating the image of the world boils down to: adding, deleting and updating the language utterances that express that world.”
…

“If it is possible to create solid ontology’s, developing new applications can really become modulair.”
[ed.knowt: Uhmm…]
…

“Why does one need self definition?  The answer is: if language L has a set of syntactic rules R with a subset of meta rules M, one only has to formulate the logic for parsing, phrasing, etc. for M in order to apply them to R. If M is not a subset of R, there are 2 levels for which to formulate the logic. Moreover we should additionally define a set of meta meta rules to define the meta rules.”

Latherature!